Mike Chen
Commissioner, Seat 7, San Francisco Planning CommissionRaised family zoning and upzoning at three meetings.
Next Planning Commission meeting: Thu, Nov 5, 12:00 pm · Clerk’s calendar
One clip, newest first
“I mean, I think this is quite a fascinating project because I think when the family zoning plan came about, I think there was some question, I think, from housing advocates about whether I think there were some questions about whether the family zoning plan was so restrictive that developers would just choose to keep using the state density bonus.”
Issues Chen raised, by number of meetings
- Family zoning and upzoning3 meetings
Every roll call, and Chen’s other bodies
Present at 1 of 1 roll calls at the Planning Commission, roll call through Jul 30, 2026
- Planning Commission: talk time not compared. On a random sample of meeting time, between 36% and 66% of members' speech here carries a name; we rank when the low end reaches 60%.
Development and land use took the largest share of Chen’s speech with a checked topic: 60%
3 places Chen named in meetings
- Chinatown 1 time
- Mission 1 time
- South of Market 1 time
Every meeting where we identified Chen’s voice
- Oct 8, 2026Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use2.1 min1:39:54
- Oct 1, 2026Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use10.9 min1:07:37
- Sep 24, 2026Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use5.1 min34:22
- Sep 10, 2026Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use3.6 min1:03:53
- Sep 3, 2026Planning CommissionHistoric preservation · Development and land use19.9 min1:15:40
- Jul 30, 2026Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use4.4 min6:41
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged
We identified Chen’s voice at six meetings. A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Chen was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Mike Chen’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Chen said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Chen or of San Francisco alone.