Nabihah Azim
Member, San Francisco Treasure Island Development AuthorityWe identified Azim’s voice at seven meetings. Named Treasure Island most often: seven times.
Next Treasure Island Development Authority meeting: Fri, Nov 6, 10:00 am · Clerk’s calendar
Two clips, newest first
“In terms of the parking, I know it was first come, first serve for renting the parking spaces. Is there some bifurcation of affordable versus market rate in terms of access to the parking spots?”
“Do you have a timeline on the remaining financing needed? And do you feel like the TCAC applications, you’ll be all set and most likely awarded?”
Azim asked 15 questions at the seven Treasure Island Development Authority meetings where we identified them
One place Azim named in meetings
- Treasure Island 7 times
Every meeting where we identified Azim’s voice
- Jul 8, 2026Treasure Island Development AuthorityParks and recreation2.6 min34:32
- Jun 10, 2026Treasure Island Development Authority1.4 min6:33
- Jun 5, 2026Treasure Island Development Authority2.0 min1:00:05
- Mar 11, 2026Treasure Island Development Authority1.8 min34:12
- Feb 11, 2026Treasure Island Development AuthorityHousing and tenants2.2 min28:43
- Jan 14, 2026Treasure Island Development Authority0.6 min39:36
- Nov 19, 2025Treasure Island Development AuthorityHomelessness1.4 min38:04
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Azim was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Nabihah Azim’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Azim said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Azim or of San Francisco alone.