San Francisco
Menu

Ovava Afuhaamango

Vice president, San Francisco Sheriff's Department Oversight Board

We identified Afuhaamango’s voice at three meetings.

Next Sheriff's Department Oversight Board meeting: Fri, Nov 6, 2:00 pm · Clerk’s calendar

One clip, newest first

  • Ovava Afuhaamango · Member · Sheriff's Department Oversight Board · Jan 9, 2026 · 33:31

    “Do your guys’ services overlap with other community orgs that come in, or is it kind of separate?”

Talk time, and Afuhaamango’s other bodies
Questions

Afuhaamango asked two questions at the three Sheriff's Department Oversight Board meetings where we identified them

At least this many: direct questions only.

Of Afuhaamango’s 2 questions to city departments at the Sheriff's Department Oversight Board, 1 went to police and sheriff oversight.

Who they question: 2 questions to a department, 1 body · Oct 24, 2025 – Oct 8, 2026.

Sheriff's Department Oversight Board2 questions to city departments
Sheriff's Department Oversight Board: questions by department
DepartmentShareQuestions
Police and sheriff oversight1
Sheriff, jails and probation1
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Afuhaamango’s voice

Three, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Afuhaamango’s first remark.

  1. Jan 9, 2026Sheriff's Department Oversight BoardPolicing and public safety4.1 min33:13
  2. Dec 5, 2025Sheriff's Department Oversight BoardPolicing and public safety4.9 min27:32
  3. Nov 14, 2025Sheriff's Department Oversight BoardPolicing and public safety1.9 min1:04:00
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Afuhaamango was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Ovava Afuhaamango’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Afuhaamango said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Afuhaamango or of San Francisco alone.