San Francisco
Menu

Ruby Bolaria Shifrin

Member, Seat 9, San Francisco Our City Our Home Oversight Committee

We identified Shifrin’s voice at two meetings.

One clip, newest first

  • Ruby Bolaria Shifrin · Member · Our City Our Home Oversight Committee · Jun 5, 2026 · 33:00

    “Is it this pot of money or is there another pot of money that’s addressing federal cuts in voucher holders with mixed immigration status that might lose their benefits?”

Questions

Shifrin asked seven questions at the two Our City Our Home Oversight Committee meetings where we identified them

At least this many: direct questions only.

Of Shifrin’s 4 questions to city departments at the Our City Our Home Oversight Committee, 2 went to homelessness services.

Who they question: 4 questions to a department, 1 body · Oct 24, 2025 – Oct 8, 2026.

Our City Our Home Oversight Committee4 questions to city departments
Our City Our Home Oversight Committee: questions by department
DepartmentShareQuestions
Homelessness services2
Housing2
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Shifrin’s voice

Two, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Shifrin’s first remark.

  1. Jun 5, 2026Our City Our Home Oversight Committee2.1 min32:57
  2. Mar 26, 2026Our City Our Home Oversight Committee3.3 min33:04
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Shifrin was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Ruby Bolaria Shifrin’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Shifrin said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Shifrin or of San Francisco alone.