Scott Dignan
Member, Mayor, San Francisco Sheriff's Department Oversight BoardWe identified Dignan’s voice at five meetings.
Next Sheriff's Department Oversight Board meeting: Fri, Nov 6, 2:00 pm · Clerk’s calendar
Two clips, newest first
“And with clients, sometimes the clients have a lot of property with them, not just on their person. They have other things that belong to them. What happens with their property?”
“…when you were doing the presentation, you said the numbers were coming from California-wide. Were any of the numbers reflected based on San Francisco today?”
Every roll call, and Dignan’s other bodies
Present at 6 of 6 roll calls at the Sheriff's Department Oversight Board, roll call through Jul 24, 2026
- Sheriff's Department Oversight Board: talk time not compared. We could name only 29% of the speech they may have given; we compare members at 30%.
Dignan asked eight questions at the five Sheriff's Department Oversight Board meetings where we identified them
Of Dignan’s 6 questions to city departments at the Sheriff's Department Oversight Board, 6 went to sheriff, jails and probation.
| Department | Share | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Sheriff, jails and probation | 6100% |
One place Dignan named in meetings
- South of Market 2 times
Every meeting where we identified Dignan’s voice
- Sep 4, 2026Sheriff's Department Oversight Board1.5 min2:15:34
- May 1, 2026Sheriff's Department Oversight BoardPolicing and public safety2.4 min31:01
- Mar 6, 2026Sheriff's Department Oversight BoardPolicing and public safety1.3 min26:25
- Jan 9, 2026Sheriff's Department Oversight BoardPolicing and public safety0.7 min1:13:05
- Nov 14, 2025Sheriff's Department Oversight Board0.6 min5:27
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Dignan was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Scott Dignan’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Dignan said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Dignan or of San Francisco alone.
