San Francisco
Menu
Photo: official page

Sonya Clark-Herrera

Commissioner, San Francisco Recreation and Park Commission

We identified Clark-Herrera’s voice at eight meetings.

8 of 11transcribed meetings with their voice identified
14questions at the Recreation and Park Commission
7 of 9present at roll calls through Jul 16, 2026, from the clerk

Two clips, newest first

  • Sonya Clark-Herrera · Commissioner · Recreation and Park Commission · May 21, 2026 · 2:00:27

    “And then you will be bringing the concept plan around— from your graphic, it looks like sometime this fall?”

  • Sonya Clark-Herrera · Commissioner · Recreation and Park Commission · Jul 16, 2026 · 2:45:35

    “Did the city’s evaluation indicate that COPs offer a more favorable payment terms from the Open Space Fund, like resulting in a lower cost of borrowing, or is there some benefit that we’re having?”

Every roll call, and Clark-Herrera’s other bodies

Present at 7 of 9 roll calls at the Recreation and Park Commission, roll call through Jul 16, 2026

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 2. Nov 20, 2025 to Jul 16, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 9 of the 12 meetings we hold, through Jul 16, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
  • Recreation and Park Commission: talk time not compared. On a random sample of meeting time, between 56% and 83% of members' speech here carries a name; we rank when the low end reaches 60%.
Questions

Clark-Herrera asked 14 questions at the eight Recreation and Park Commission meetings where we identified them

At least this many: direct questions only.

Of Clark-Herrera’s 10 questions to city departments at the Recreation and Park Commission, 10 went to parks and recreation.

Who they question: 10 questions to a department, 1 body · Oct 24, 2025 – Oct 8, 2026.

Recreation and Park Commission10 questions to city departments
Recreation and Park Commission: questions by department
DepartmentShareQuestions
Parks and recreation10100%
Neighborhoods Clark-Herrera named

One place Clark-Herrera named in meetings

Lines where Clark-Herrera named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

San Francisco
  • Golden Gate Park 1 time

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Analysis Neighborhoods file (DataSF (City and County of San Francisco)). A dot says the place was named, not where Clark-Herrera was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Clark-Herrera’s voice

Eight, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Clark-Herrera’s first remark.

  1. Sep 17, 2026Recreation and Park CommissionParks and recreation3.8 min3:10
  2. Jul 16, 2026Recreation and Park CommissionParks and recreation · Budget and spending7.5 min5:28
  3. May 21, 2026Recreation and Park CommissionParks and recreation2.4 min15:10
  4. Apr 16, 2026Recreation and Park CommissionParks and recreation5.1 min7:04
  5. Feb 19, 2026Recreation and Park CommissionParks and recreation · Budget and spending4.8 min1:13:52
  6. Jan 15, 2026Recreation and Park CommissionParks and recreation2.6 min1:13:44
  7. Dec 18, 2025Recreation and Park Commission1.4 min1:05:24
  8. Nov 20, 2025Recreation and Park Commission0.6 min38:23
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Clark-Herrera was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Sonya Clark-Herrera’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Clark-Herrera said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Clark-Herrera or of San Francisco alone.