San Francisco
Menu
Photo: official page

Tessie Guillermo

Commissioner, San Francisco Health Commission

We identified Guillermo’s voice at 14 meetings.

14 of 20transcribed meetings with their voice identified
6.0min a meeting at the Health Commission, at least
21questions at the Health Commission
6 of 7present at roll calls through Aug 17, 2026, from the clerk
Share card

One clip, newest first

  • Tessie Guillermo · Commissioner · Health Commission · Jul 6, 2026 · 1:02:10

    “Would it be possible in the next update to get some of that information on the evaluations and assessments just so that we get a sense if there is satisfaction or areas that are— just sort of need some attention with regard to particularly outside contractors that are providing security services?”

Every roll call

Present at 6 of 7 roll calls at the Health Commission, roll call through Aug 17, 2026

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Excused 1 · Absent 0. May 4, 2026 to Aug 17, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 8 of the 20 meetings we hold, through Aug 17, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
What they talk about

Health and behavioral health took the largest share of Guillermo’s speech with a checked topic: 65%

By the agenda item on the floor when they spoke, at the Health Commission (clerk’s agenda times). 100 of 119 minutes of their speech have a checked topic. How much they talk about it, not which side they take.

Health and behavioral health65%
Commendations, ceremonies and memorials20%
Housing and tenants3.4%
Questions

Guillermo asked 21 questions at the 14 Health Commission meetings where we identified them

At least this many: direct questions only.

Of Guillermo’s 18 questions to city departments at the Health Commission, 18 went to public health and mental health.

Who they question: 18 questions to a department, 1 body · Oct 24, 2025 – Oct 8, 2026.

Health Commission18 questions to city departments
Health Commission: questions by department
DepartmentShareQuestions
Public health and mental health18100%
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Guillermo’s voice

14, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Guillermo’s first remark.

  1. Oct 5, 2026Health CommissionHealth and behavioral health · Arts, culture and libraries7.4 min21:36
  2. Sep 21, 2026Health CommissionHealth and behavioral health6.5 min16:25
  3. Aug 17, 2026Health CommissionHealth and behavioral health12.9 min21:58
  4. Aug 3, 2026Health CommissionBudget and spending · Health and behavioral health6.1 min42:20
  5. Jul 20, 2026Health CommissionHealth and behavioral health · City workforce and labor8.8 min12:55
  6. Jul 6, 2026Health CommissionHealth and behavioral health · Budget and spending6.6 min0:22
  7. Jun 15, 2026Health CommissionHealth and behavioral health16.7 min9:45
  8. May 4, 2026Health CommissionHousing and tenants6.7 min18:07
  9. Apr 6, 2026Health CommissionHealth and behavioral health6.3 min16:57
  10. Mar 16, 2026Health CommissionHealth and behavioral health11.2 min1:48:39
Show all 14Show fewer
  1. Mar 2, 2026Health CommissionBudget and spending3.0 min1:36:59
  2. Dec 15, 2025Health CommissionHealth and behavioral health9.1 min9:00
  3. Dec 1, 2025Health Commission6.2 min0:25
  4. Nov 3, 2025Health CommissionBudget and spending · Health and behavioral health12.0 min26:22
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Guillermo was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Tessie Guillermo’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Guillermo said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Guillermo or of San Francisco alone.