San Francisco
Menu

Tim Tung

Chair, San Francisco General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee

We identified Tung’s voice at six meetings.

6 of 6transcribed meetings with their voice identified
3 of 3present at roll calls through Jun 8, 2026, from the clerk

Chairs the General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee

See all

One clip, newest first

  • Tim Tung · Member · General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee · Feb 9, 2026 · 47:27

    “Is there a written sort of threshold for what measure, you know, to sort of what stage these complaints go through? Whether it’s investigated, whether it’s closed with insufficient information? Is, is this like a policy that’s written out, or is this kind of a case-by-case?”

Every roll call, and Tung’s other bodies

Present at 3 of 3 roll calls at the General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee, roll call through Jun 8, 2026

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 0. Feb 9, 2026 to Jun 8, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 5 of the 6 meetings we hold, through Jun 8, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Tung’s voice

Six, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Tung’s first remark.

  1. Aug 10, 2026General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee4.7 min5:25
  2. Jun 8, 2026General Obligation Bond Oversight CommitteeBudget and spending6.9 min0:39
  3. Apr 13, 2026General Obligation Bond Oversight CommitteeBudget and spending8.0 min0:29
  4. Feb 9, 2026General Obligation Bond Oversight CommitteeHealth and behavioral health · Budget and spending17.2 min0:29
  5. Dec 8, 2025General Obligation Bond Oversight CommitteeBudget and spending5.4 min0:42
  6. Oct 27, 2025General Obligation Bond Oversight CommitteeBudget and spending2.4 min13:47
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Tung was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Tim Tung’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Tung said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Tung or of San Francisco alone.