Timothy Reyff
Vice president, San Francisco Treasure Island Development AuthorityWe identified Reyff’s voice at six meetings.
Next Treasure Island Development Authority meeting: Fri, Nov 6, 10:00 am · Clerk’s calendar
Two clips, newest first
“I really like the fact that most of this has, you know, that we can add to almost existing floor plans and stuff like that without having to go, you know, increase height limits and all that sort of thing.”
“…you mentioned further feasibility studies. Is there any timeline on, like, you know, how long those are going to last?”
Issues Reyff raised, by number of meetings
- Family zoning and upzoning1 meeting
Reyff asked two questions at the six Treasure Island Development Authority meetings where we identified them
Reyff’s one question to a city department at the Treasure Island Development Authority went to transportation and transit.
| Department | Share | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Transportation and transit | 1 |
One place Reyff named in meetings
- Treasure Island 1 time
Every meeting where we identified Reyff’s voice
- Jul 8, 2026Treasure Island Development Authority1.1 min31:52
- Jun 5, 2026Treasure Island Development Authority1.1 min1:13:53
- May 13, 2026Treasure Island Development Authority0.8 min56:40
- Mar 11, 2026Treasure Island Development Authority1.1 min20:07
- Mar 6, 2026Treasure Island Development AuthorityHousing and tenants1.6 min36:20
- Dec 10, 2025Treasure Island Development Authority0.9 min14:59
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Reyff was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Timothy Reyff’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Reyff said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Reyff or of San Francisco alone.