Port Commission · Mar 10, 2026
Tuesday3 h 07 min4 officials identified1 public speaker5 agenda itemsRoll call: 3 present (clerk)Video: SFGovTV
The item that drew the most public speakers: Informational presentation identifying key factors the Developer and Port staff will evaluate for potential to improve the feasibility of the proposed…, 1 speaker, over 26 min.
Click any time stamp on this page to jump the video there.
Agenda · 5 itemsShowHide
- 0:19Approval of minutes - february 24, 2026
- 1:02:419A. Acting Executive Director's Report
- 1:41:4311A. Proposed Leasing Efficiency Policies and Monthly Rental Rate Schedule, Monthly Parking Stall Rates, and Special Event Rates, effective upon adoption. (Resolutions 26-14, 26-15, 26-16, 26-17, and 26-18)
- 2:11:0511B. Informational presentation identifying key factors the Developer and Port staff will evaluate for potential to improve the feasibility of the proposed redevelopment of Piers 30-32.
- 2:37:5712A. Informational presentation on draft Port of San Francisco guidelines for the naming of Port facilities through recognition and commemoration of individuals, places, and events.
What happened
Each sentence checked against the transcript.
- Item 9A, the acting executive director’s report, was taken up, and a report for March 10th was presented.1:02:31
Quotes
Officials only, in order.
Or tech companies come in to think that they can run the port. That’s not their job to run the port. I can see them partnering, but I think we have to remain autonomous and have control over the Port of San Francisco because it’s under the Burton Act?Willie Adams · Commissioner3:02:36
Who spoke
4 officials identified · talk time, most first.
- Willie AdamsCommissioner · 11 minFirst speaks at 1:00:05
- Rich LeeCommissioner · 11 minFirst speaks at 1:19:38
- Stephen EngblomPresident · 9.1 minFirst speaks at 1:29:24
- Ken McNeelyVice president · 2.9 minFirst speaks at 1:22:54
Roll call: 3 present, 0 excused, 0 absent. From the clerkPublic comment: 1 speaker.
How we count
Each summary sentence is checked against the transcript before it is published; in a blind check, 99 of 100 sentences were right. A voice gets an official’s name only when two AI readers and a code check agree, so the minutes undercount and are not attendance. Officials only: members of the public are counted, never named, shown or quoted, and full transcripts aren’t published because they can carry their names. More on how we know
Cite this page
Hamlet, “Port Commission, Mar 10, 2026: San Francisco.” https://cities.myhamlet.com/sf/port/meetings/2026-03-10. Data as of Oct 9, 2026 (version 2ea162c); meeting of Mar 10, 2026.