Chicago
Menu

Francine Washington

Commissioner, Chicago Housing Authority Board of Commissioners

We identified Washington’s voice at five meetings.

One clip, newest first

  • Francine Washington · Commissioner · Chicago Housing Authority Board of Commissioners · Nov 25, 2025 · 1:33:55

    “Do you have transitional housing for those that want to move on? I might have fell down, they had to go I stay in a shelter for a while, but now I got myself together, got me a job, we’re gonna move on. Do you have transitional housing for them to go to?”

Talk time, and Washington’s other bodies
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Washington’s voice

Five, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Washington’s first remark.

  1. Sep 15, 2026Chicago Housing Authority Board of Commissioners2.5 min2:11:55
  2. Jul 21, 2026Chicago Housing Authority Board of Commissioners1.0 min1:00:17
  3. May 26, 2026Chicago Housing Authority Board of Commissioners5.0 min2:47:31
  4. Mar 17, 2026Chicago Housing Authority Board of Commissioners0.6 min4:38:07
  5. Nov 25, 2025Chicago Housing Authority Board of Commissioners7.2 min1:07:05
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Washington was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Francine Washington’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Washington said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Washington or of Chicago alone.