Gina Piemonte
Attorney, West Side, Chicago Community Commission for Public Safety and AccountabilityWe identified Piemonte’s voice at 10 meetings.
Next Community Commission for Public Safety and Accountability meeting: Thu, Nov 12, 6:30 pm · Clerk’s calendar
One clip, newest first
Issues Piemonte raised, by number of meetings
- ICE and immigration enforcement2 meetings
Talk time, and Piemonte’s other bodies
- Community Commission for Public Safety and Accountability: talk time not compared. Fewer than four members can be compared fairly.
Every meeting where we identified Piemonte’s voice
- Aug 27, 2026Community Commission for Public Safety and Accountability4.5 min38:40
- Jul 30, 2026Community Commission for Public Safety and Accountability3.2 min29:00
- May 28, 2026Community Commission for Public Safety and Accountability2.0 min1:54:54
- Apr 30, 2026Community Commission for Public Safety and Accountability1.6 min45:43
- Apr 2, 2026Community Commission for Public Safety and Accountability1.7 min31:45
- Mar 26, 2026Community Commission for Public Safety and Accountability2.2 min36:51
- Feb 26, 2026Community Commission for Public Safety and Accountability1.2 min50:33
- Jan 29, 2026Community Commission for Public Safety and Accountability6.2 min35:44
- Nov 13, 2025Community Commission for Public Safety and Accountability0.2 min29:49
- Oct 30, 2025Community Commission for Public Safety and Accountability0.4 min2:03:30
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Piemonte was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Gina Piemonte’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Piemonte said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Piemonte or of Chicago alone.
