Amber Sheikh
Vice chair, LAHSA CommissionWe identified Sheikh’s voice at 11 meetings across two bodies.
Also sits on 1 other body
One clip, newest first
“I don’t know if it’s worth presenting that as a whole at some point, other than it seems rather futile, I know, in some ways, but just to explain to the system and the general public the, the cliff of newly emerging homelessness that will come out of this, these sets of crises.”
Issues Sheikh raised, by number of meetings
- Homelessness and LAHSA2 meetings
Talk time, and Sheikh’s other bodies
- LAHSA Commission: talk time not compared. Ran some of its meetings, so isn’t compared with the members.
- Harbor Area Planning Commission: talk time not compared. Seated for only 2 meetings in 12 months.
Every meeting where we identified Sheikh’s voice
- Sep 25, 2026LAHSA Commission2.4 min33:16
- Aug 28, 2026LAHSA Commission0.3 min1:20:08
- Jul 24, 2026LAHSA Commission6.0 min0:48
- Jun 22, 2026LAHSA Commission5.5 min0:46
- Jun 2, 2026Harbor Area Planning Commission0.9 min1:26:08
- May 22, 2026LAHSA Commission13.0 min0:42
- Mar 31, 2026LAHSA Commission3.1 min1:07
- Feb 27, 2026LAHSA Commission18.6 min1:12
- Jan 23, 2026LAHSA Commission0.9 min1:26:53
- Dec 1, 2025LAHSA Commission1.7 min28:35
Show all 11Show fewer
- Oct 24, 2025LAHSA Commission9.3 min0:26
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Sheikh was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Amber Sheikh’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Sheikh said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Sheikh or of Los Angeles alone.
