Los Angeles
Menu

Daniel K. Tabor

Vice president, Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners

Raised ICE and immigration enforcement at seven meetings.

21 of 25transcribed meetings with their voice identified
6.8min a meeting at the Board of Police Commissioners, at least
Share card

Three clips, newest first

“Have we had any incidents where officers at the point of an immigration action began their responsibility of identifying the lead officer from the federal side from ICE and we did not get a response, an appropriate response or information directly?”Los Angeles2:16:04
ICE and immigration enforcementDaniel K. TaborCommissioner · Board of Police Commissioners · Jul 28, 2026 · 2:16:04Open the meeting at 2:16:04
ICE and immigration enforcement“Are we expecting officers to interrupt or to identify the appropriate person representing ICE to gain information about who they are, who the other officers are?”Daniel K. TaborCommissioner · Board of Police Commissioners · Mar 3, 2026 · 2:12:50“I, I don’t have a question specific to the presentation and the report for us, but I do want to ask that at some point we would come back and discuss drone pilot program as a both a recruitment tool and a training opportunity.”Daniel K. TaborCommissioner · Board of Police Commissioners · Jan 27, 2026 · 2:38:10

Officials only. Public speakers are counted, never named.

Issues Tabor raised, by number of meetings

We count who raised an issue, not which side they took.

Neighborhoods Tabor named

One place Tabor named in meetings

Lines where Tabor named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

Los Angeles
  • South Los Angeles 3 times

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Neighborhood Councils (Certified) file (City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering (LA GeoHub)). A dot says the place was named, not where Tabor was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Tabor’s voice

21, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Tabor’s first remark.

  1. Sep 22, 2026Board of Police Commissioners8.0 min22:27
  2. Sep 1, 2026Board of Police Commissioners11.6 min17:02
  3. Aug 18, 2026Board of Police Commissioners5.0 min11:22
  4. Aug 11, 2026Board of Police Commissioners11.7 min14:44
  5. Jul 28, 2026Board of Police Commissioners11.0 min18:52
  6. Jul 14, 2026Board of Police Commissioners20.9 min1:35:05
  7. Jun 30, 2026Board of Police Commissioners12.5 min10:32
  8. Jun 9, 2026Board of Police Commissioners10.4 min14:50
  9. Jun 2, 2026Board of Police Commissioners4.6 min18:40
  10. May 12, 2026Board of Police Commissioners7.8 min2:20:12
Show all 21Show fewer
  1. May 5, 2026Board of Police Commissioners11.9 min26:38
  2. Apr 28, 2026Board of Police Commissioners3.9 min24:31
  3. Apr 14, 2026Board of Police Commissioners3.3 min1:46:32
  4. Apr 7, 2026Board of Police Commissioners4.0 min16:00
  5. Mar 24, 2026Board of Police Commissioners19.7 min2:41:23
  6. Mar 10, 2026Board of Police Commissioners3.3 min2:00:56
  7. Mar 3, 2026Board of Police Commissioners8.1 min1:45:29
  8. Feb 24, 2026Board of Police Commissioners2.3 min2:15:27
  9. Feb 10, 2026Board of Police Commissioners0.9 min1:43:59
  10. Feb 3, 2026Board of Police Commissioners5.2 min23:59
  11. Jan 27, 2026Board of Police Commissioners4.6 min3:39
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

We identified Tabor’s voice at 21 meetings. A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Tabor was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Daniel K. Tabor’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Tabor said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Tabor or of Los Angeles alone.