Los Angeles
Menu

Edward R. Renwick

Commissioner, Los Angeles Board of Harbor Commissioners

We identified Renwick’s voice at nine meetings.

9 of 15transcribed meetings with their voice identified

One clip, newest first

  • Edward R. Renwick · Commissioner · Board of Harbor Commissioners · Apr 14, 2026 · 1:14:25

    “And my compliments to the, the finance team and the entire team for putting together an outstanding budget and one that’s very understandable given its complexity. Um, a couple of things I noted. One, overall, our operating costs are growing at a faster rate than our revenues, correct?”

Talk time, and Renwick’s other bodies
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Renwick’s voice

Nine, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Renwick’s first remark.

  1. Sep 30, 2026Board of Harbor Commissioners0.1 min43:08
  2. Sep 10, 2026Board of Harbor Commissioners7.3 min2:54
  3. Aug 13, 2026Board of Harbor Commissioners7.5 min17:52
  4. Jul 9, 2026Board of Harbor Commissioners3.1 min26:43
  5. Apr 14, 2026Board of Harbor Commissioners7.0 min15:12
  6. Feb 12, 2026Board of Harbor Commissioners2.2 min14:10
  7. Jan 29, 2026Board of Harbor Commissioners2.0 min23:14
  8. Dec 4, 2025Board of Harbor Commissioners1.0 min1:21:32
  9. Nov 20, 2025Board of Harbor Commissioners3.3 min20:18
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Renwick was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Edward R. Renwick’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Renwick said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Renwick or of Los Angeles alone.