Los Angeles
Menu

Faith I. Mitchell

Commissioner, Los Angeles Board of Public Works

We identified Mitchell’s voice at 38 meetings.

Two clips, newest first

  • Faith I. Mitchell · Commissioner · Board of Public Works · Sep 30, 2026 · 1:22:25

    “If we had to replace existing to connect up with the expansion, what number are we talking about?”

  • Faith I. Mitchell · Commissioner · Board of Public Works · Jul 29, 2026 · 1:06:05

    “…with regards to the delay on the private utility relocation: What what impact is that having on the overall delay?”

Issues Mitchell raised, by number of meetings

We count who raised an issue, not which side they took.

Talk time, and Mitchell’s other bodies
What they talk about

Commendations, ceremonies and memorials took 47% of Mitchell’s speech with a checked topic

By the topic two AI readers agree on for each stretch of their talk, at the Board of Public Works. 94 of 135 minutes of their speech have a checked topic. How much they talk about it, not which side they take.

Commendations, ceremonies and memorials47%
Streets, traffic and parking27%
Development and land use1.9%
Questions

Mitchell asked 167 questions at the 38 Board of Public Works meetings where we identified them

At least this many: direct questions only.

Of Mitchell’s 128 questions to city departments at the Board of Public Works, 119 went to public works, streets and sanitation.

Who they question: 128 questions to a department, 1 body · Oct 24, 2025 – Oct 2, 2026.

Board of Public Works128 questions to city departments
Board of Public Works: questions by department
DepartmentShareQuestions
Public works, streets and sanitation11993%
Transportation and transit65%
City attorney / law department32%
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Mitchell’s voice

38, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Mitchell’s first remark.

  1. Sep 30, 2026Board of Public Works3.5 min1:21:07
  2. Aug 19, 2026Board of Public Works3.6 min1:13:43
  3. Aug 5, 2026Board of Public Works3.5 min1:07:12
  4. Jul 31, 2026Board of Public Works2.7 min35:09
  5. Jul 29, 2026Board of Public Works4.3 min1:05:56
  6. Jul 15, 2026Board of Public Works1.8 min3:07:04
  7. Jul 1, 2026Board of Public Works4.8 min1:13:14
  8. Jun 26, 2026Board of Public Works10.2 min1:10:42
  9. May 29, 2026Board of Public Works7.1 min29:54
  10. May 27, 2026Board of Public Works0.8 min59:32
Show all 38Show fewer
  1. May 20, 2026Board of Public Works2.8 min1:20:56
  2. Apr 22, 2026Board of Public Works1.6 min2:24:14
  3. Apr 17, 2026Board of Public Works7.1 min1:22:27
  4. Mar 25, 2026Board of Public Works1.0 min34:37
  5. Mar 9, 2026Board of Public Works0.6 min57:36
  6. Mar 6, 2026Board of Public Works1.1 min12:41
  7. Mar 4, 2026Board of Public Works1.8 min44:57
  8. Feb 27, 2026Board of Public Works14.3 min38:22
  9. Feb 25, 2026Board of Public Works1.0 min1:52:42
  10. Feb 20, 2026Board of Public Works7.3 min25:50
  11. Feb 11, 2026Board of Public Works0.9 min1:13:47
  12. Feb 4, 2026Board of Public Works1.8 min47:28
  13. Jan 30, 2026Board of Public Works6.1 min44:06
  14. Jan 23, 2026Board of Public Works4.0 minVideo
  15. Jan 21, 2026Board of Public Works5.2 min1:54:27
  16. Jan 16, 2026Board of Public Works1.5 min1:31:37
  17. Jan 14, 2026Board of Public Works0.6 min1:00:44
  18. Dec 19, 2025Board of Public Works2.0 min54:32
  19. Dec 17, 2025Board of Public Works0.5 min1:11:06
  20. Dec 15, 2025Board of Public Works2.3 min32:29
  21. Dec 5, 2025Board of Public Works7.7 min17:44
  22. Dec 3, 2025Board of Public Works1.7 min1:36:53
  23. Nov 26, 2025Board of Public Works1.4 min2:56
  24. Nov 17, 2025Board of Public Works0.6 min1:23:46
  25. Nov 10, 2025Board of Public Works0.2 min30:34
  26. Nov 5, 2025Board of Public Works13.9 min11:04
  27. Oct 31, 2025Board of Public Works2.7 min24:10
  28. Oct 29, 2025Board of Public Works1.2 min2:10:00
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Mitchell was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Faith I. Mitchell’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Mitchell said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Mitchell or of Los Angeles alone.