Members
The talk-time ranking for the Public Design Commission is held
Too few members’ voices are identified here to compare. Each member’s page has their clips and meetings.Members · listed by seatOpen their page: every clip, meeting and topicOpen their page: every clip, meeting and topic
“Voice identified” counts the meetings where we could attribute a member’s voice. A meeting missing there means we couldn’t attribute it, not that they were absent.Isabel CastillaLandscape Architecture · Landscape architecture member—talk time not measuredVoice identified at 1 of 5 transcribed meetings while seated
AttendanceThe clerk’s roll calls for this body aren’t in our record.
Speaking—Too little of their speech carries a checked name to compare.
Their top topicsNo checked topic mix for this member here yet.
One of their clips
I think the location generally makes sense because of sightlines. But not knowing if it’s going to impact trees that are extremely old is very important. Not knowing if there can be a ramp that’s needed is really important because the ramp will occupy space that then impacts other sites. So in the general vicinity, the location is fine.”
Laurie HawkinsonArchitecture · Architecture member—talk time not measuredVoice identified at 1 of 5 transcribed meetings while seated
AttendanceThe clerk’s roll calls for this body aren’t in our record.
Speaking—Too little of their speech carries a checked name to compare.
Their top topicsNo checked topic mix for this member here yet.