New York
Menu

Diana I. Ayala

Former member, Council, New York City Council

We identified Ayala’s voice at four meetings across three bodies.

Former member. Ayala’s term ended Dec 31, 2025; our record covers only the final months.

One clip, newest first

  • Diana I. Ayala · Chair · Committee on General Welfare · Dec 3, 2025 · 1:43:27

    “Not necessarily in the units, but there have been some questionable people that have taken over the building. And so in the conversation, I brought up the possibility of working with the city and leasing up those units to, you know, families coming out of shelter.”

Issues Ayala raised, by number of meetings

We count who raised an issue, not which side they took.

Every roll call, and Ayala’s other bodies

Present at 4 of 5 roll calls at the New York City Council, roll call through Dec 18, 2025

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 1. Oct 29, 2025 to Dec 18, 2025.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Ayala’s voice

Four, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Ayala’s first remark.

  1. Dec 18, 2025Committee on General Welfare4.0 min0:18
  2. Dec 18, 2025New York City Council7.7 min1:31:17
  3. Dec 18, 2025Committee on Land Use2.7 min20:20
  4. Dec 3, 2025Committee on General Welfare35.4 min11:34
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Ayala was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Diana I. Ayala’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Ayala said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Ayala or of New York alone.