New York
Menu

Michael Goldblum

Member, New York Landmarks Preservation Commission

We identified Goldblum’s voice at 21 meetings. Named SoHo most often: three times.

21 of 23transcribed meetings with their voice identified
11.6min a meeting at the Landmarks Preservation Commission, at least
57questions at the Landmarks Preservation Commission
Share card

Next Landmarks Preservation Commission meeting: Tue, Nov 10 · Agenda

Two clips, newest first

  • Michael Goldblum · Member · Landmarks Preservation Commission · Sep 15, 2026 · 1:41:39

    “What I’m asking specifically is, has the commission ever authorized the removal of a stained glass, non-religiously themed stained glass window from a building For sale, for permanent sale and removal.”

  • Michael Goldblum · Member · Landmarks Preservation Commission · Jul 28, 2026 · 1:26:05

    “So now that the building is stabilized Why would you expect the brick to continue deteriorating?”

What they talk about

Historic preservation took the largest share of Goldblum’s speech with a checked topic: 100%

By the topic two AI readers agree on for each stretch of their talk, at the Landmarks Preservation Commission. 267 of 267 minutes of their speech have a checked topic. How much they talk about it, not which side they take.

Historic preservation100%
Questions

Goldblum asked 57 questions at the 21 Landmarks Preservation Commission meetings where we identified them

At least this many: direct questions only.

Of Goldblum’s 12 questions to city departments at the Landmarks Preservation Commission, 9 went to planning and zoning.

Who they question: 12 questions to a department, 1 body · Oct 24, 2025 – Oct 8, 2026.

Landmarks Preservation Commission12 questions to city departments
Landmarks Preservation Commission: questions by department
DepartmentShareQuestions
Planning and zoning975%
Parks and recreation325%
Neighborhoods Goldblum named

9 places Goldblum named in meetings

Lines where Goldblum named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

New York
  • SoHo 3 times
  • Upper East Side 3 times, the most of any official
  • Manhattan 2 times
  • Upper West Side 2 times
  • Brooklyn 1 time
  • Brooklyn Heights 1 time
  • Clinton Hill 1 time
  • Ditmas Park 1 time
  • Greenwich Village 1 time

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s 2020 Neighborhood Tabulation Areas (NTAs) file (NYC Department of City Planning, via NYC Open Data). A dot says the place was named, not where Goldblum was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Goldblum’s voice

21, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Goldblum’s first remark.

  1. Sep 15, 2026Landmarks Preservation Commission19.6 min43:27
  2. Sep 1, 2026Landmarks Preservation Commission10.4 min34:54
  3. Jul 28, 2026Landmarks Preservation Commission8.9 min53:08
  4. Jul 21, 2026Landmarks Preservation Commission8.5 min1:01:56
  5. Jul 14, 2026Landmarks Preservation Commission20.9 min9:50
  6. Jun 23, 2026Landmarks Preservation Commission5.1 min49:15
  7. Jun 9, 2026Landmarks Preservation Commission6.1 min37:28
  8. May 12, 2026Landmarks Preservation Commission10.9 min1:03:27
  9. May 5, 2026Landmarks Preservation Commission7.9 min10:22
  10. Apr 14, 2026Landmarks Preservation Commission10.3 min25:47
Show all 21Show fewer
  1. Apr 7, 2026Landmarks Preservation Commission8.4 min28:32
  2. Mar 24, 2026Landmarks Preservation Commission17.8 min1:19:24
  3. Mar 17, 2026Landmarks Preservation Commission9.1 min23:00
  4. Feb 24, 2026Landmarks Preservation Commission25.2 min11:24
  5. Feb 10, 2026Landmarks Preservation Commission14.1 min1:31:19
  6. Feb 3, 2026Landmarks Preservation Commission16.5 min1:06:40
  7. Jan 13, 2026Landmarks Preservation Commission14.9 min46:51
  8. Jan 6, 2026Landmarks Preservation Commission13.1 min1:08:11
  9. Nov 25, 2025Landmarks Preservation Commission19.5 min18:41
  10. Nov 18, 2025Landmarks Preservation Commission10.4 min36:46
  11. Oct 28, 2025Landmarks Preservation Commission9.3 min37:20
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Goldblum was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Michael Goldblum’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Goldblum said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Goldblum or of New York alone.