Historic Preservation Commission · Feb 4, 2026
Wednesday53 min4 officials identified2 public speakers6 agenda itemsRoll call: 6 present (clerk)Video: SFGovTV
The item that drew the most public speakers: FREEDOM WEST 2.0 PROJECT (710 MCALLISTER STREET)? Review and comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the proposed project, 2 speakers, over 24 min.
Click any time stamp on this page to jump the video there.
Agenda · 6 itemsShowHide
- 3:18CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION: Draft Minutes for January 21, 2026
- 4:21D. consideration of items proposed for continuance
- 4:504a. SAINT PAUL?S CHURCH (1660 CHURCH STREET) ? Recommend as an individual Article 10 Landmark
- 4:524b. MOST HOLY REDEEMER CHURCH COMPLEX (100-117 DIAMOND STREET)? Recommend as an individual Article 10 Landmark
- 6:02Fy2026-2028 proposed department budget and work program
- 28:43FREEDOM WEST 2.0 PROJECT (710 MCALLISTER STREET)? Review and comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the proposed project
What happened
Each sentence checked against the transcript.
- Department staff gave announcements, including a virtual forum that evening on the District 3 landmarking and two landmark districts in District 8 being at the full Board that day.1:40
- On the consent calendar, two landmark designations (items 4A and 4B) were taken up, and a motion to recommend denial of both was made and announced as passed.5:27
Who spoke
4 officials identified · talk time, most first.
- Diane MatsudaPresident · Seat 7 At Large · 5.5 minFirst speaks at 3:43
- Chris FoleyCommissioner · Seat 5 · 1.2 minFirst speaks at 46:39
- Eleanor R. CoxCommissioner · Seat 3 Architectural Historian · 0.6 minFirst speaks at 47:47
- Gayle Tsern StrangCommissioner · Seat 1 Historic Architect · 0.6 minFirst speaks at 26:49
Roll call: 6 present, 0 excused, 0 absent. From the clerkPublic comment: 2 speakers.
How we count
Each summary sentence is checked against the transcript before it is published; in a blind check, 99 of 100 sentences were right. A voice gets an official’s name only when two AI readers and a code check agree, so the minutes undercount and are not attendance. Officials only: members of the public are counted, never named, shown or quoted, and full transcripts aren’t published because they can carry their names. More on how we know
Cite this page
Hamlet, “Historic Preservation Commission, Feb 4, 2026: San Francisco.” https://cities.myhamlet.com/sf/historic-preservation/meetings/2026-02-04. Data as of Oct 9, 2026 (version d14b03c); meeting of Feb 4, 2026.