San Francisco
Menu

Eleanor R. Cox

Commissioner, Seat 3 Architectural Historian, San Francisco Historic Preservation Commission

We identified Cox’s voice at 11 meetings.

11 of 19transcribed meetings with their voice identified
0.9min a meeting at the Historic Preservation Commission, at least
11questions at the Historic Preservation Commission
15 of 15present at roll calls through Aug 19, 2026, from the clerk
Share card

Next Historic Preservation Commission meeting: Wed, Nov 4, 12:30 pm · Clerk’s calendar

One clip, newest first

  • Eleanor R. Cox · Commissioner · Historic Preservation Commission · Nov 19, 2025 · 31:36

    “So we could look at the landmark nomination, and if it’s listed, then it would likely require a permit?”

Every roll call

Present at 15 of 15 roll calls at the Historic Preservation Commission, roll call through Aug 19, 2026

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 0. Nov 19, 2025 to Aug 19, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 17 of the 20 meetings we hold, through Aug 19, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
Questions

Cox asked 11 questions at the 11 Historic Preservation Commission meetings where we identified them

At least this many: direct questions only.

Of Cox’s 4 questions to city departments at the Historic Preservation Commission, 4 went to planning and zoning.

Who they question: 4 questions to a department, 1 body · Oct 24, 2025 – Oct 8, 2026.

Historic Preservation Commission4 questions to city departments
Historic Preservation Commission: questions by department
DepartmentShareQuestions
Planning and zoning4
Neighborhoods Cox named

One place Cox named in meetings

Lines where Cox named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

San Francisco
  • West of Twin Peaks 1 time

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Analysis Neighborhoods file (DataSF (City and County of San Francisco)). A dot says the place was named, not where Cox was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Cox’s voice

11, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Cox’s first remark.

  1. Sep 2, 2026Historic Preservation Commission1.5 min9:38
  2. Aug 19, 2026Historic Preservation CommissionHistoric preservation2.2 min17:01
  3. Jul 1, 2026Historic Preservation CommissionHistoric preservation1.0 min1:08:54
  4. Jun 17, 2026Historic Preservation CommissionHistoric preservation1.4 min20:38
  5. May 20, 2026Historic Preservation CommissionHistoric preservation4.0 min3:39
  6. May 6, 2026Historic Preservation Commission0.4 min36:49
  7. Mar 18, 2026Historic Preservation CommissionHistoric preservation1.9 min36:52
  8. Feb 4, 2026Historic Preservation CommissionDevelopment and land use0.6 min48:10
  9. Jan 21, 2026Historic Preservation CommissionDevelopment and land use2.4 min1:45:46
  10. Jan 7, 2026Historic Preservation CommissionBusiness and economic development1.7 min1:13:33
Show all 11Show fewer
  1. Nov 19, 2025Historic Preservation Commission0.4 min31:09
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Cox was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Eleanor R. Cox’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Cox said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Cox or of San Francisco alone.