San Francisco
Menu

Amy Campbell

President, Seat 6, San Francisco Planning Commission

Raised family zoning and upzoning at five meetings.

23 of 30transcribed meetings with their voice identified
23 of 23present at roll calls through Jul 30, 2026, from the clerk

Presides over the Planning Commission

See all

Next Planning Commission meeting: Thu, Nov 5, 12:00 pm · Clerk’s calendar

Two clips, newest first

  • Amy Campbell · Commissioner · Planning Commission · Nov 20, 2025 · 1:52:13

    “I am appreciating staff’s recommended modifications. I think my concern with every amendment we’ve seen come out since September 11th when we voted on the family zoning plan is that they present potential roadblocks and deterrents to achieving the goals of the family zoning plan.”

  • Amy Campbell · Commissioner · Planning Commission · Dec 4, 2025 · 3:05:25

    “I think from a practical standpoint and from a sustainability perspective, I would lean towards that as a compromise in this situation. I think it’s a bit of a win-win. It keeps a family here in the city. It provides them a home that works for them. But upon sale, it gets us back the units that we’re looking for.”

Issues Campbell raised, by number of meetings

We count who raised an issue, not which side they took.

Every roll call, and Campbell’s other bodies

Present at 23 of 23 roll calls at the Planning Commission, roll call through Jul 30, 2026

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 0. Nov 6, 2025 to Jul 30, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 24 of the 31 meetings we hold, through Jul 30, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
  • Planning Commission: talk time not compared. Presides over its meetings, so isn’t compared with the members.
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Campbell’s voice

23, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Campbell’s first remark.

  1. Oct 8, 2026Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use4.3 min34:31
  2. Oct 1, 2026Planning Commission0.9 min2:44
  3. Sep 24, 2026Planning Commission0.5 min55:11
  4. Sep 17, 2026Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use4.6 min37:52
  5. Sep 10, 2026Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use1.5 min1:16:04
  6. Sep 3, 2026Planning CommissionHistoric preservation · Development and land use6.6 min4:18
  7. Jul 30, 2026Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use9.5 min4:49
  8. Jul 23, 2026Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use1.7 min4:07:50
  9. Jun 25, 2026Planning Commission4.4 min3:59
  10. Jun 18, 2026Planning CommissionHousing and tenants · Development and land use3.9 min2:27:23
Show all 23Show fewer
  1. May 28, 2026Planning Commission0.2 min1:54:40
  2. May 7, 2026Planning Commission1.1 min12:23
  3. Apr 16, 2026Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use1.6 min1:05:22
  4. Mar 26, 2026Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use2.7 min2:34
  5. Mar 19, 2026Planning Commission0.1 min26:24
  6. Feb 12, 2026Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use5.1 min6:32
  7. Jan 29, 2026Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use1.7 min1:15:48
  8. Jan 22, 2026Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use1.2 min1:10:25
  9. Jan 15, 2026Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use · Alcohol, cannabis and business permits4.1 min1:23:16
  10. Dec 4, 2025Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use3.8 min1:13:32
  11. Nov 20, 2025Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use4.3 min2:23
  12. Nov 13, 2025Planning CommissionDevelopment and land use1.3 min38:45
  13. Nov 6, 2025Planning Commission1.8 min2:38:45
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

We identified Campbell’s voice at 23 meetings. A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Campbell was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Amy Campbell’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Campbell said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Campbell or of San Francisco alone.