San Francisco
Menu

Planning Commission · Sep 17, 2026

Thursday2 h 45 min5 officials identified9 public speakers9 agenda itemsVideo: SFGovTV

The item that drew the most public speakers: 1027, 1031-1033, 1043-1045, & 1047-1049 CLAYTON STREET - Request for Conditional Use Authorization to demolish existing two-family dwelling and construct…, 7 speakers, over 1 h 19 min.

  • Nov 253
  • Dec 253
  • Jan 263
  • Feb 262
  • Mar 263
  • Apr 262
  • May 263
  • Jun 262
  • Jul 263
  • Sep 264
  • Oct 263
30 of 31 meetings transcribed, Oct 24, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026.This meeting: Sep 17, 2026
0:00:002:45:00

Click any time stamp on this page to jump the video there.

Agenda · 9 itemsShowHide
  1. 1:22A. consideration of items proposed for continuanceunder 1 min · Routine business
  2. 1:23Item title withheldit could name a private person · 1 min · Development and land use
  3. 2:282. 800 IRVING STREET - Request for Conditional Use Authorization to establish a Formula Retail Financial Service use (d.b.a. BMO Bank N.A.)under 1 min · Development and land use
  4. 3:26CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION: Draft Minutes for September 3, 20263 min · Routine business
  5. 7:01Item title withheldit could name a private person · 35 min · Routine business
  6. 42:298. 345 SPEAR STREET / 2 HARRISON STREET - Request for Office Development Authorization31 min · Development and land use · 1 clip
  7. 1:14:149. 2089 INGALLS STREET - Request for Conditional Use Authorization to expand an Industrial Agriculture use, for the purpose of cannabis cultivation4 min
  8. 1:18:5510. 1027, 1031-1033, 1043-1045, & 1047-1049 CLAYTON STREET - Request for Conditional Use Authorization to demolish existing two-family dwelling and construct nine dwelling units1 h 19 min · Development and land use · 1 clip · 7 public speakers
  9. 2:38:10Item title withheldit could name a private person · 6 min · Development and land use

What happened

Each sentence checked against the transcript.

  1. Planning Department staff presented item 7, enforcement penalty guidelines, and asked the Commission to adopt criteria for assessing the one-time penalty for misrepresenting tenant information on development applications.13:07

Quotes

Officials only, in order.

I’ve worked in this building on and off since ‘97. It used to be a very vibrant building, but San Francisco was just generally vibrant all the time anyway. To see Hills Plaza go from what it was to— it’s still a beautiful, beautiful building, but it doesn’t have the activation it once had.Sean McGarry · Commissioner · Seat 456:46
I will conclude with my own thought process here is that this project really do comply with our new family zoning plan and our new design guideline, the design standards, and it does comply with the setback that is required, and I’ve seen it’s pretty clear, 20— actually, 27 feet.Lydia So · Commissioner · Seat 52:15:27

Who spoke

5 officials identified · talk time, most first.

Public comment: 9 speakers.

How we count

Each summary sentence is checked against the transcript before it is published; in a blind check, 99 of 100 sentences were right. A voice gets an official’s name only when two AI readers and a code check agree, so the minutes undercount and are not attendance. Officials only: members of the public are counted, never named, shown or quoted, and full transcripts aren’t published because they can carry their names. More on how we know

Cite this page

Hamlet, “Planning Commission, Sep 17, 2026: San Francisco.” https://cities.myhamlet.com/sf/planning-commission/meetings/2026-09-17. Data as of Oct 9, 2026 (version d14b03c); meeting of Sep 17, 2026.