San Francisco
Menu

Larry Low

Commissioner, San Francisco Police Commission

We identified Low’s voice at 15 meetings.

15 of 20transcribed meetings with their voice identified
1.7min a meeting at the Police Commission, at least
16questions at the Police Commission
5 of 5present at roll calls through Jul 15, 2026, from the clerk
Share card

Next Police Commission meeting: Wed, Nov 4, 6:00 pm · Clerk’s calendar

Two clips, newest first

  • Larry Low · Commissioner · Police Commission · Jul 8, 2026 · 2:19:03

    “…with respect to a body camera that’s not working, did you really intend for that to be a true exception, that somebody can go out on patrol, can go out on a route and not have a camera as a result because it didn’t work?”

  • Larry Low · Commissioner · Police Commission · Nov 19, 2025 · 23:00

    “And one of the callers mentioned that there was over 900 dog bites in the city. Is that right? Aggressive dogs are— so I don’t know if that’s the fact, or is that just— I was just wondering if the police have any data on that, or did they have that many dog bites out there.”

Every roll call

Present at 5 of 5 roll calls at the Police Commission, roll call through Jul 15, 2026

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 0. Jun 3, 2026 to Jul 15, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 11 of the 23 meetings we hold, through Jul 15, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
Questions

Low asked 16 questions at the 15 Police Commission meetings where we identified them

At least this many: direct questions only.

Of Low’s 16 questions to city departments at the Police Commission, 16 went to police.

Who they question: 16 questions to a department, 1 body · Oct 24, 2025 – Oct 8, 2026.

Police Commission16 questions to city departments
Police Commission: questions by department
DepartmentShareQuestions
Police16100%
Neighborhoods Low named

3 places Low named in meetings

Lines where Low named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

San Francisco
  • Chinatown 2 times
  • Richmond District 1 time
  • Treasure Island 1 time

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Analysis Neighborhoods file (DataSF (City and County of San Francisco)). A dot says the place was named, not where Low was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Low’s voice

15, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Low’s first remark.

  1. Oct 7, 2026Police Commission2.7 min49:05
  2. Jul 8, 2026Police CommissionPolicing and public safety3.5 min2:04:06
  3. Jun 17, 2026Police CommissionPolicing and public safety1.1 min26:46
  4. Jun 10, 2026Police CommissionPolicing and public safety1.5 min44:57
  5. Jun 3, 2026Police Commission2.9 min0:40
  6. Apr 8, 2026Police CommissionPolicing and public safety3.4 min5:42
  7. Apr 1, 2026Police Commission5.4 min20:03
  8. Mar 4, 2026Police CommissionPolicing and public safety2.9 min31:26
  9. Feb 18, 2026Police CommissionPolicing and public safety1.9 min11:33
  10. Feb 11, 2026Police CommissionPolicing and public safety3.2 min9:39
Show all 15Show fewer
  1. Jan 21, 2026Police Commission1.0 min7:38
  2. Jan 14, 2026Police CommissionPolicing and public safety1.2 min17:48
  3. Jan 7, 2026Police CommissionPolicing and public safety1.3 min33:06
  4. Nov 19, 2025Police CommissionPolicing and public safety1.8 min3:15
  5. Nov 5, 2025Police Commission0.5 min5:36
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Low was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Larry Low’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Low said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Low or of San Francisco alone.