San Francisco
Menu

Mattie Scott

Commissioner, San Francisco Police Commission

We identified Scott’s voice at 16 meetings. Named Bayview Hunters Point most often: three times.

16 of 20transcribed meetings with their voice identified
4.5min a meeting at the Police Commission, at least
27questions at the Police Commission
8 of 9present at roll calls through Jul 15, 2026, from the clerk
Share card

Next Police Commission meeting: Wed, Nov 4, 6:00 pm · Clerk’s calendar

Two clips, newest first

  • Mattie Scott · Commissioner · Police Commission · Mar 4, 2026 · 33:31

    “…what did we— what is the percentage of guns that we’ve found in gun trafficking? Is there a number?”

  • Mattie Scott · Commissioner · Police Commission · Nov 19, 2025 · 1:19:53

    “…we surveying the communities and getting feedback from the community of the importance of becoming a police officer? Here in San Francisco. Are we doing that?”

Every roll call

Present at 8 of 9 roll calls at the Police Commission, roll call through Jul 15, 2026

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Excused 1 · Absent 0. Feb 18, 2026 to Jul 15, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 11 of the 23 meetings we hold, through Jul 15, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
Questions

Scott asked 27 questions at the 16 Police Commission meetings where we identified them

At least this many: direct questions only.

Of Scott’s 26 questions to city departments at the Police Commission, 25 went to police.

Who they question: 26 questions to a department, 1 body · Oct 24, 2025 – Oct 8, 2026.

Police Commission26 questions to city departments
Police Commission: questions by department
DepartmentShareQuestions
Police2596%
Police and sheriff oversight14%
Neighborhoods Scott named

3 places Scott named in meetings

Lines where Scott named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

San Francisco
  • Bayview Hunters Point 3 times
  • Haight Ashbury 1 time
  • Tenderloin 1 time

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Analysis Neighborhoods file (DataSF (City and County of San Francisco)). A dot says the place was named, not where Scott was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Scott’s voice

16, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Scott’s first remark.

  1. Oct 7, 2026Police CommissionPolicing and public safety3.2 min16:17
  2. Jul 8, 2026Police CommissionPolicing and public safety9.3 min1:07:08
  3. Jun 17, 2026Police CommissionPolicing and public safety2.0 min24:36
  4. Jun 10, 2026Police CommissionPolicing and public safety5.6 min23:46
  5. Jun 3, 2026Police Commission15.2 min7:18
  6. Apr 8, 2026Police Commission6.7 min18:47
  7. Apr 1, 2026Police CommissionPolicing and public safety11.8 min25:30
  8. Mar 18, 2026Police Commission5.9 min4:46
  9. Mar 4, 2026Police Commission0.8 min33:11
  10. Feb 18, 2026Police CommissionPolicing and public safety1.1 min14:30
Show all 16Show fewer
  1. Feb 11, 2026Police CommissionPolicing and public safety4.6 min8:35
  2. Feb 4, 2026Police CommissionPolicing and public safety5.7 min18:53
  3. Jan 21, 2026Police Commission3.6 min6:54
  4. Jan 7, 2026Police CommissionPolicing and public safety4.1 min18:25
  5. Nov 19, 2025Police CommissionPolicing and public safety8.9 min2:49
  6. Nov 5, 2025Police CommissionPolicing and public safety0.7 min32:42
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Scott was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Mattie Scott’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Scott said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Scott or of San Francisco alone.