Los Angeles
Menu

Gloria Roberts

Non-voting member, non-voting, Los Angeles LA Metro Operations, Safety, and Customer Experience Committee

We identified Roberts’ voice at eight meetings across three bodies.

4 of 8transcribed meetings with their voice identified
0.4min a meeting at the LA Metro Operations, Safety, and Customer Experience Committee, at least

Also sits on 2 other bodies

See all
Talk time, and Roberts’ other bodies
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Roberts’ voice

Eight, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Roberts’ first remark.

  1. Jul 16, 2026LA Metro Operations, Safety, and Customer Experience Committee0.3 min1:03:44
  2. May 28, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors1.0 min39:42
  3. Apr 16, 2026LA Metro Operations, Safety, and Customer Experience Committee0.9 min43:49
  4. Feb 19, 2026LA Metro Operations, Safety, and Customer Experience Committee0.8 min2:02:47
  5. Feb 18, 2026LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee0.4 min40:07
  6. Jan 14, 2026LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee1.9 min1:36:34
  7. Nov 20, 2025LA Metro Operations, Safety, and Customer Experience Committee1.3 min42:29
  8. Nov 19, 2025LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee1.3 min1:01:18
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Roberts was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Gloria Roberts’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Roberts said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Roberts or of Los Angeles alone.