Los Angeles
Menu

LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee · Nov 19, 2025

Wednesday1 h 34 min5 officials identified16 public speakers18 agenda itemsVideo: Granicus

The longest item after routine business: East san fernando valley shared right-of-way, 29 min of this 1 h 34 min meeting.

  • Nov 251
  • Jan 261
  • Feb 261
  • Mar 261
  • Apr 261
  • May 261
  • Jul 261
  • Sep 261
8 meetings, all transcribed, Oct 24, 2025 to Oct 2, 2026.This meeting: Nov 19, 2025
0:00:001:34:00

Click any time stamp on this page to jump the video there.

Agenda · 18 itemsShowHide
  1. 2:22APPROVE Consent Calendar Items: 5. Consent Calendar items are approved by one motion unless held by a Director for discussion and/or separate action.under 1 min
  2. 2:53Public Speaker was called to speakLindsey Horvath was called to speakAra J. Najarian was called to speakJacquelyn Dupont-Walker was called to speakPublic Speaker was called to speakHilda L. Solis was called to speakJacquelyn Dupont-Walker was called to speakPublic Speaker was called to speakJacquelyn Dupont-Walker was called to speakLindsey Horvath was called to speakHilda L. Solis was called to speakGloria Roberts was called to speakAra J. Najarian was called to speakJacquelyn Dupont-Walker was called to speakJames Butts was called to speakPublic Speaker was called to speakJames Butts was called to speakJames Butts was called to speakJacquelyn Dupont-Walker was called to speakPublic Speaker was called to speakunder 1 min
  3. 3:44Motion to Approve APPROVE Consent Calendar Items: 5. Consent Calendar items are approved by one motion unless held by a Director for discussion and/or separate action. Moved by 0, no second required.under 1 min
  4. 3:56Vote to Approve APPROVE Consent Calendar Items: 5. Consent Calendar items are approved by one motion unless held by a Director for discussion and/or separate action. (Approved)under 1 min
  5. 4:05OPEN AND SLOW STREETS GRANT PROGRAM CYCLES SIX AND SEVEN CONSIDER A. AWARDING $10 million to the Open and Slow Streets Grant Program Cycles Six and Seven to fund 29 events scheduled either during the 2026 FIFA World Cup or 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games (Attachment A); and B. AUTHORIZING a waiting list of eligible events that may be awarded administratively, should funding become available from Cycles Six and Seven (Attachment A).under 1 min
  6. 4:13EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY SHARED RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSIDER: A. RECEIVING AND FILING the East San Fernando Valley (ESFV) Shared Railroad Right-of-Way (ROW) Study Final Report (Attachment A), the Outreach Summary Report (Attachment B), and the Interim Terminus Parking Analysis (Northern Segment) (Attachment C); B. AUTHORIZING the Chief Executive Officer to approve the Scenario 2 Metrolink option as the preferred alternative for the East San Fernando Valley Light Rail Transit (ESFV LRT) Project; C. AUTHORIZING staff to continue planning work on improvements related to Scenario 2, consisting of the following: 1. Rail Crossing safety improvements at six (6) at-grade rail crossings along the 2.5-mile corridor as part of improvements to the Metrolink Antelope Valley Line (AVL); 2. Design and conduct environmental clearance of a new Pacoima Metrolink infill station, including evaluation and selection of either a center-platform (Scenario 2a) or side-platform (Scenario 2b) configuration; and 3. Identify funds to program through a separate Board action for successful completion of the planned work.29 min
  7. 33:44EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY SHARED RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSIDER: A. RECEIVING AND FILING the East San Fernando Valley (ESFV) Shared Railroad Right-of-Way (ROW) Study Final Report (Attachment A), the Outreach Summary Report (Attachment B), and the Interim Terminus Parking Analysis (Northern Segment) (Attachment C); B. AUTHORIZING the Chief Executive Officer to approve the Scenario 2 Metrolink option as the preferred alternative for the East San Fernando Valley Light Rail Transit (ESFV LRT) Project; C. AUTHORIZING staff to continue planning work on improvements related to Scenario 2, consisting of the following: 1. Rail Crossing safety improvements at six (6) at-grade rail crossings along the 2.5-mile corridor as part of improvements to the Metrolink Antelope Valley Line (AVL); 2. Design and conduct environmental clearance of a new Pacoima Metrolink infill station, including evaluation and selection of either a center-platform (Scenario 2a) or side-platform (Scenario 2b) configuration; and 3. Identify funds to program through a separate Board action for successful completion of the planned work. Moved by 0, no second required.under 1 min
  8. 33:54EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY SHARED RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSIDER: A. RECEIVING AND FILING the East San Fernando Valley (ESFV) Shared Railroad Right-of-Way (ROW) Study Final Report (Attachment A), the Outreach Summary Report (Attachment B), and the Interim Terminus Parking Analysis (Northern Segment) (Attachment C); B. AUTHORIZING the Chief Executive Officer to approve the Scenario 2 Metrolink option as the preferred alternative for the East San Fernando Valley Light Rail Transit (ESFV LRT) Project; C. AUTHORIZING staff to continue planning work on improvements related to Scenario 2, consisting of the following: 1. Rail Crossing safety improvements at six (6) at-grade rail crossings along the 2.5-mile corridor as part of improvements to the Metrolink Antelope Valley Line (AVL); 2. Design and conduct environmental clearance of a new Pacoima Metrolink infill station, including evaluation and selection of either a center-platform (Scenario 2a) or side-platform (Scenario 2b) configuration; and 3. Identify funds to program through a separate Board action for successful completion of the planned work. (Approved)under 1 min
  9. 34:032026 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPROVE the programming request of up to $218,369,000 in Regional Transportation Improvement Program funds, including a target share for a LA County request of $134,483,000 and an additional maximum target share request of $83,886,000 as an interest-free advance from LA County's estimated future STIP shares.5 min
  10. 39:042026 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPROVE the programming request of up to $218,369,000 in Regional Transportation Improvement Program funds, including a target share for a LA County request of $134,483,000 and an additional maximum target share request of $83,886,000 as an interest-free advance from LA County's estimated future STIP shares. Moved by 0, no second required.under 1 min
  11. 39:072026 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPROVE the programming request of up to $218,369,000 in Regional Transportation Improvement Program funds, including a target share for a LA County request of $134,483,000 and an additional maximum target share request of $83,886,000 as an interest-free advance from LA County's estimated future STIP shares. (Approved)under 1 min
  12. 39:13WARNER CENTER MICROTRANSIT PILOT PROGRAM MOTION APPROVE Motion by Horvath, Najarian, Barger, and Padilla that the Board direct the Chief Executive Officer to: A. Assist in evaluating the Warner Center Micro Transit Pilot Program after six months and one year of operation, including but not limited to: 1. ridership; 2. operating costs (annual and per trip); and 3. a qualitative survey to determine commuter perspectives and preferences; and B. Upon successful completion of the Warner Center Microtransit Pilot Program, and a determination that the Pilot Program generated positive results in terms of ridership, cost efficiency, and commuter preference, to present the findings to the San Fernando Valley Service Council and the Metro Board, including, any recommendations.4 min
  13. 43:53WARNER CENTER MICROTRANSIT PILOT PROGRAM MOTION APPROVE Motion by Horvath, Najarian, Barger, and Padilla that the Board direct the Chief Executive Officer to: A. Assist in evaluating the Warner Center Micro Transit Pilot Program after six months and one year of operation, including but not limited to: 1. ridership; 2. operating costs (annual and per trip); and 3. a qualitative survey to determine commuter perspectives and preferences; and B. Upon successful completion of the Warner Center Microtransit Pilot Program, and a determination that the Pilot Program generated positive results in terms of ridership, cost efficiency, and commuter preference, to present the findings to the San Fernando Valley Service Council and the Metro Board, including, any recommendations. Moved by 0, no second required.under 1 min
  14. 44:10WARNER CENTER MICROTRANSIT PILOT PROGRAM MOTION APPROVE Motion by Horvath, Najarian, Barger, and Padilla that the Board direct the Chief Executive Officer to: A. Assist in evaluating the Warner Center Micro Transit Pilot Program after six months and one year of operation, including but not limited to: 1. ridership; 2. operating costs (annual and per trip); and 3. a qualitative survey to determine commuter perspectives and preferences; and B. Upon successful completion of the Warner Center Microtransit Pilot Program, and a determination that the Pilot Program generated positive results in terms of ridership, cost efficiency, and commuter preference, to present the findings to the San Fernando Valley Service Council and the Metro Board, including, any recommendations. (Approved)13 min
  15. 57:22Item title withheldit could name a private person · 35 min
  16. 1:32:56Item title withheldit could name a private person · under 1 min
  17. 1:33:01Item title withheldit could name a private person · under 1 min
  18. 1:33:05GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVE General Public Commentunder 1 min

What happened

Each sentence checked against the transcript.

  1. A request from Director Horvath to remove item 6 from the consent agenda was noted, and item 6 was set to be heard last.2:30
  2. Staff from countywide planning presented the East San Fernando Valley Shared Right-of-Way Study report, with Scenario 2, the Metrolink option, as the recommended preferred alternative.4:50

Who spoke

5 officials identified · talk time, most first.

Public comment: 16 speakers.

How we count

Each summary sentence is checked against the transcript before it is published; in a blind check, 98 of 100 sentences were right. A voice gets an official’s name only when two AI readers and a code check agree, so the minutes undercount and are not attendance. Officials only: members of the public are counted, never named, shown or quoted, and full transcripts aren’t published because they can carry their names. More on how we know

Cite this page

Hamlet, “LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee, Nov 19, 2025: Los Angeles.” https://cities.myhamlet.com/la/metro-planning-programming/meetings/2025-11-19. Data as of Oct 9, 2026 (version d14b03c); meeting of Nov 19, 2025.