Los Angeles
Menu

Jacquelyn Dupont-Walker

Director, Chair, Los Angeles LA Metro Board of Directors

Raised 2028 Olympics at five meetings. Named Van Nuys most often: two times.

10 of 11transcribed meetings with their voice identified
2.8min a meeting at the LA Metro Board of Directors, at least

Chairs the LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee; sits on 3 more committees

See all
Share card

One clip, newest first

  • Jacquelyn Dupont-Walker · Chair · LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee · Jul 15, 2026 · 8:42

    “I, I join, I’m sure, the entire board in commending Metro staff and our Games Mobility executive partners for successfully securing $90 million through the Federal Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2026. As you indicated, it’s an important down payment preparing for our transportation network for 2028 Olympics and Paralympics Games and reflects the strong collaboration among our regional partners.”

Issues Dupont-Walker raised, by number of meetings

We count who raised an issue, not which side they took.

Talk time, and Dupont-Walker’s other bodies
Neighborhoods Dupont-Walker named

4 places Dupont-Walker named in meetings

Lines where Dupont-Walker named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

Los Angeles
  • Van Nuys 2 times
  • Pacoima 1 time
  • San Pedro 1 time
  • South Los Angeles 1 time

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Neighborhood Councils (Certified) file (City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering (LA GeoHub)). A dot says the place was named, not where Dupont-Walker was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Dupont-Walker’s voice

25, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Dupont-Walker’s first remark.

  1. Sep 17, 2026LA Metro Operations, Safety, and Customer Experience Committee6.7 min30:19
  2. Sep 16, 2026LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee6.1 min2:56
  3. Sep 16, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors1.7 min44:56
  4. Sep 16, 2026LA Metro Construction Committee2.5 min3:42
  5. Jul 23, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors4.0 min23:53
  6. Jul 16, 2026LA Metro Executive Management Committee7.0 min16:20
  7. Jul 16, 2026LA Metro Operations, Safety, and Customer Experience Committee7.5 min1:04:02
  8. Jul 15, 2026LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee14.5 minVideo
  9. May 28, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors7.4 min33:25
  10. May 21, 2026LA Metro Executive Management Committee7.8 minVideo
Show all 25Show fewer
  1. Apr 23, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors3.1 min28:44
  2. Apr 15, 2026LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee11.3 minVideo
  3. Apr 15, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors3.5 min34:28
  4. Mar 26, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors1.0 min17:07
  5. Mar 19, 2026LA Metro Executive Management Committee8.7 min32:22
  6. Mar 18, 2026LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee9.3 min4:25
  7. Feb 26, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors2.5 min30:02
  8. Feb 19, 2026LA Metro Executive Management Committee2.2 min32:48
  9. Feb 18, 2026LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee4.1 minVideo
  10. Jan 22, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors2.9 min1:12:50
  11. Jan 15, 2026LA Metro Executive Management Committee3.1 min12:34
  12. Jan 14, 2026LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee6.3 minVideo
  13. Jan 14, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors1.6 min32:28
  14. Dec 4, 2025LA Metro Board of Directors2.8 min1:32:52
  15. Nov 19, 2025LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee6.1 min2:28
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged

We identified Dupont-Walker’s voice at 25 meetings across five bodies. A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Dupont-Walker was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Jacquelyn Dupont-Walker’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Dupont-Walker said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Dupont-Walker or of Los Angeles alone.