Hilda L. Solis

Committee member, Committee, Los Angeles LA Metro Executive Management Committee

Raised homelessness and LAHSA at four meetings. Named North Hollywood most often: two times.

7 of 8transcribed meetings with their voice identified

Also sits on 2 other bodies

See all

Two clips, newest first

Hilda L. Solis · Committee member · LA Metro Executive Management Committee · Jul 16, 2026 · 32:28
“In part, you have to understand, the public has to understand, that we just got hit really hard by the federal government as well. So many of those vouchers that we thought we had went away. And now they’re shifting from permanent housing to look at interim housing.”
Hilda L. Solis · Committee member · LA Metro Executive Management Committee · May 21, 2026 · 50:42
“We may not be able to recover with some of these proposed cuts. So that’s on that. And on the federal level, well, 878 million for, uh, Olympics.”

Issues Solis raised, by number of meetings

Homelessness and LAHSA4 meetings
2028 Olympics4 meetings

We count who raised an issue, not which side they took.

Talk time, and Solis’ other bodies

LA Metro Board of Directors: 2.7 min of speech a meeting, range 0.7–6.0. In the same range as 10 other members.
LA Metro Executive Management Committee: talk time not compared. Fewer than four members can be compared fairly.
LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee: talk time not compared. Ran some of its meetings, so isn’t compared with the members.

Neighborhoods Solis named

4 places Solis named in meetings

Lines where Solis named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

Los Angeles

North Hollywood 2 times
East Hollywood 1 time
Hollywood 1 time
Westwood 1 time

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Neighborhood Councils (Certified) file (City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering (LA GeoHub)). A dot says the place was named, not where Solis was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Solis’ voice

19, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Solis’ first remark.

Sep 17, 2026LA Metro Executive Management Committee1.8 min12:50
Sep 16, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors4.1 min10:00
Sep 16, 2026LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee1.7 min14:14
Jul 23, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors4.5 min37:13
Jul 16, 2026LA Metro Executive Management Committee5.8 min18:11
Jul 15, 2026LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee10.1 min10:42
May 28, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors17.0 min22:35
May 21, 2026LA Metro Executive Management Committee4.5 min24:04
May 20, 2026LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee5.7 min2:35
Apr 16, 2026LA Metro Executive Management Committee8.7 min10:36

Show all 19Show fewer

Apr 15, 2026LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee3.9 min25:42
Feb 26, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors1.9 min57:12
Feb 19, 2026LA Metro Executive Management Committee2.6 min31:08
Feb 18, 2026LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee2.8 min22:43
Jan 22, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors1.9 min1:10:49
Jan 15, 2026LA Metro Executive Management Committee3.5 min14:05
Dec 4, 2025LA Metro Board of Directors0.3 min2:19
Nov 20, 2025LA Metro Executive Management Committee6.3 min1:17:34
Nov 19, 2025LA Metro Planning and Programming Committee2.9 min38:17

How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged

We identified Solis’ voice at 19 meetings across three bodies. A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Solis was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Hilda L. Solis’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Solis said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Solis or of Los Angeles alone.