Carmen N. De La Rosa
Council member, District 10, New York City CouncilWe identified Rosa’s voice at 27 meetings across 10 bodies.
Chairs the Committee on Technology; sits on 5 more committees
See all
- New York City Council · Council member
- Committee on Technology · Chair
- Committee on Civil Service and Labor · Chair · until Dec 31, 2025
- Committee on Education · Member
- Committee on Fire and Emergency Management · Member
- Committee on Consumer and Worker Protection · Member
- Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · Member · until Dec 31, 2025
- Committee on Veterans · Member
- Committee on Public Safety · Member · until Dec 31, 2025
- Committee on Health · Member
Next New York City Council meeting: Thu, Nov 12, 1:30 pm · Agenda
One clip, newest first
“Does the DOE monitor student computer use in classrooms through programs like GoGuardian or any other monitoring tools or additional apps?”
Issues Rosa raised, by number of meetings
- NYCHA and public housing1 meeting
- Shelters and homelessness1 meeting
Where Rosa sits
District 10 on the current New York City Council map
Carmen N. De La Rosa sits for District 10. Click a district to open its member’s page.District lines: NYC Open Data, City Council Districts, 872g-cjhh, fetched 2026-10-30.
Every roll call, and Rosa’s other bodies
Present at 23 of 23 roll calls at the New York City Council
PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call
Official roll call, from the clerk →- Committee on Education: 1.4 min of speech a meeting, range 0.2–3.4. In the same range as 10 other members.
- Committee on Technology: talk time not compared. Presides over its meetings, so isn’t compared with the members.
- Committee on Civil Service and Labor: talk time not compared. Listed on the roster as Chair, so isn’t compared with the members.
- Committee on Fire and Emergency Management: talk time not compared. Seated for only 5 meetings in 12 months.
- Committee on Consumer and Worker Protection: talk time not compared. On a random sample of meeting time, between 44% and 61% of members' speech here carries a name; we rank when the low end reaches 60%.
- Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: talk time not compared. Seated for only 3 meetings in 12 months.
- Committee on Veterans: talk time not compared. Seated for only 5 meetings in 12 months.
- Committee on Public Safety: talk time not compared. Seated for only 2 meetings in 12 months.
- Committee on Health: talk time not compared. Seated for only 0 meetings in 12 months.
- Committee on Technology: present at 4 of 4 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
- Committee on Civil Service and Labor: present at 4 of 4 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
- Committee on Education: present at 14 of 14 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
- Committee on Fire and Emergency Management: present at 6 of 9 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
- Committee on Consumer and Worker Protection: present at 8 of 12 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
- Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: present at 3 of 4 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
- Committee on Veterans: present at 4 of 5 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
- Committee on Public Safety: present at 2 of 2 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
- Committee on Health: present at 9 of 11 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
- Committee on Disabilities: present at 2 of 3 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
- Committee on Immigration: present at 3 of 3 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
Questions
Rosa asked 23 questions at the three Committee on Education meetings where we identified them
Of Rosa’s 22 questions to city departments at the Committee on Education, 22 went to schools / school district.
| Department | Share | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Schools / school district | 22100% |
Meetings
Every meeting where we identified Rosa’s voice
- Sep 9, 2026Committee on Technology22.9 min0:35
- Sep 9, 2026Committee on Fire and Emergency Management22.9 min0:35
- Sep 9, 2026Committee on Public Safety22.9 min0:35
- Aug 13, 2026New York City Council0.1 min58:20
- Jun 30, 2026New York City Council2.0 min1:12:23
- Jun 24, 2026Committee on Technology9.4 min16:53
- Jun 24, 2026Committee on Education9.4 min16:53
- Jun 17, 2026Committee on Consumer and Worker Protection0.5 min37:05
- Jun 11, 2026New York City Council0.1 min37:07
- Apr 23, 2026Committee on Veterans0.4 min48:16
Show all 27Show fewer
- Apr 16, 2026New York City Council0.1 min15:16
- Apr 9, 2026Committee on Consumer and Worker Protection2.5 min1:00:20
- Mar 18, 2026Committee on Technology21.7 min0:38
- Mar 2, 2026Committee on Technology22.0 min20:26
- Feb 25, 2026Committee on Fire and Emergency Management1.2 min28:19
- Feb 24, 2026New York City Council1.6 min58:26
- Feb 10, 2026Committee on Education2.9 min1:38:24
- Jan 30, 2026Committee on Education2.1 min44:54
- Jan 29, 2026New York City Council1.2 min47:39
- Dec 18, 2025New York City Council1.4 min1:44:43
- Nov 25, 2025Committee on Civil Service and Labor2.4 min0:19
- Nov 24, 2025Committee on Consumer and Worker Protection1.3 min1:10:47
- Nov 24, 2025Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure1.3 min1:10:47
- Nov 14, 2025Committee on Health1.1 min46:14
- Nov 13, 2025Committee on Civil Service and Labor11.7 min17:29
- Oct 29, 2025Committee on Civil Service and Labor2.0 min0:12
- Oct 29, 2025New York City Council1.2 min1:14:39
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Rosa was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Carmen N. De La Rosa’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Rosa said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Rosa or of New York alone.