San Francisco
Menu

Planning Commission · Sep 3, 2026

Thursday4 h 09 min5 officials identified6 public speakers8 agenda itemsVideo: SFGovTV

The item that drew the most public speakers: Review of landmark and historic district designation, 2 speakers, over 2 h 01 min.

  • Nov 253
  • Dec 253
  • Jan 263
  • Feb 262
  • Mar 263
  • Apr 262
  • May 263
  • Jun 262
  • Jul 263
  • Sep 264
  • Oct 263
30 of 31 meetings transcribed, Oct 24, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026.This meeting: Sep 3, 2026
0:00:004:09:00

Click any time stamp on this page to jump the video there.

Agenda · 8 itemsShowHide
  1. 1:21A. consideration of items proposed for continuance2 min · Routine business
  2. 3:35CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION: Draft Minutes for July 23, 202611 min · Routine business
  3. 14:41Item title withheldit could name a private person · 8 min · Routine business
  4. 22:53Review of landmark and historic district designation2 h 01 min · Historic preservation · 2 public speakers
  5. 2:24:519a. FREEDOM WEST PROJECT Informational PresentationDevelopment and land use · 2 clips
  6. 2:24:519b. FREEDOM WEST PROJECT - Initiation of Amendments to the General Plan49 min · Development and land use
  7. 3:14:3310. 2051 MARKET STREET - Request for Major Modifications under the Housing Choice San Francisco program pursuant to Planning Code Sections 206.10 and 334, to demolish an existing two-story21 min · Development and land use · 2 clips
  8. 3:35:4311. 1142 BROADWAY - Request for Discretionary Review of Planning Application 2026-000723PRJ to build a 601-square foot, fourth story with a primary suite33 min · Development and land use

What happened

Each sentence checked against the transcript.

  1. Items proposed for continuance were taken up: one conditional use authorization was proposed for indefinite continuance and another was reported withdrawn.1:16
  2. The consent calendar, one conditional use authorization item, was announced as passing “5 to 0” after a motion to approve it.2:24
  3. A report on past events at the Board of Supervisors and the Historic Preservation Commission was given, including the Board passing over 20 landmark designations on first read.14:33

Quotes

Officials only, in order.

I mean, I think this is quite a fascinating project because I think when the family zoning plan came about, I think there was some question, I think, from housing advocates about whether I think there were some questions about whether the family zoning plan was so restrictive that developers would just choose to keep using the state density bonus.Mike Chen · Commissioner · Seat 73:28:19
Do you mind saying that one more time? I think I understand what you’re saying.Lydia So · Commissioner · Seat 53:32:59

Who spoke

5 officials identified · talk time, most first.

Public comment: 6 speakers.

How we count

Each summary sentence is checked against the transcript before it is published; in a blind check, 99 of 100 sentences were right. A voice gets an official’s name only when two AI readers and a code check agree, so the minutes undercount and are not attendance. Officials only: members of the public are counted, never named, shown or quoted, and full transcripts aren’t published because they can carry their names. More on how we know

Cite this page

Hamlet, “Planning Commission, Sep 3, 2026: San Francisco.” https://cities.myhamlet.com/sf/planning-commission/meetings/2026-09-03. Data as of Oct 9, 2026 (version d14b03c); meeting of Sep 3, 2026.