City Planning Commission · Jun 25, 2026
Thursdayat least 3 h 25 min6 officials identifiedat least 7 public speakers (2 of 8 recordings read)Video: Audio, 8 recordings
Item 6 was opened: case CPC 2023-7894-GPA-ZCCUSPRHCA and related environmental case ENV 2023-7895-MND, in Council District 2, with a technical modification noted.
Audio only. Click any time stamp to open the file there.
Recordings · 8 recordingsShowHide
What happened
Each sentence checked against the transcript. The summary covers 1 of the 8 recordings.
- Item 6 was opened: case CPC 2023-7894-GPA-ZCCUSPRHCA and related environmental case ENV 2023-7895-MND, in Council District 2, with a technical modification noted.0:00rec. 5
- Planning staff presented a mixed-use project with a self-storage facility and an 8-unit multifamily residential structure, and recommended adopting the mitigated negative declaration and approving the general plan amendment, conditional use permit, zone change and site plan review.0:57rec. 5
- The applicant’s representative presented the project to the commission.7:32rec. 5
- Public testimony was taken, and a public commenter spoke on the item before testimony was closed.9:59rec. 5
- A motion was made to continue the item to the August 13th regular meeting, and after a roll call vote it was announced “the motion carries.”1:15:01rec. 5
Quotes
Officials only, in order.
That’s the only thing that this is specific to. But when it comes to incentives around smaller legacy business or nonprofit incentives, that’s separate than this.Jacob Saitman1:18:39rec. 6
Who spoke
6 officials identified · talk time, most first.
- Jacob Saitman28 minFirst speaks at 29:03rec. 5
- Brian Rosenstein13 minFirst speaks at 42:18rec. 5
- Monique LawshePresident · 6.4 min
- Caroline ChoeVice-president · 3.8 minFirst speaks at 22:42rec. 5
- Martina Diaz2.1 minFirst speaks at 14:06rec. 5
- Sarah Johnson1.7 minFirst speaks at 11:40rec. 5
Public comment: at least 7 speakers (2 of 8 recordings read).
How we count
Each summary sentence is checked against the transcript before it is published; in a blind check, 98 of 100 sentences were right. A voice gets an official’s name only when two AI readers and a code check agree, so the minutes undercount and are not attendance. Officials only: members of the public are counted, never named, shown or quoted, and full transcripts aren’t published because they can carry their names. More on how we know
Cite this page
Hamlet, “City Planning Commission, Jun 25, 2026: Los Angeles.” https://cities.myhamlet.com/la/planning-commission/meetings/2026-06-25. Data as of Oct 9, 2026 (version d14b03c); meeting of Jun 25, 2026.



