Lamont J. Robinson
Alderperson, Ward 4, Chicago City CouncilWe identified Robinson’s voice at 25 meetings across six bodies.
Also sits on 5 committees
Next City Council meeting: Mon, Nov 2, 10:00 am · Agenda
Three clips, newest first
Officials only. Public speakers are counted, never named.
Ward 4 on the current City Council map
Every roll call, and Robinson’s other bodies
Present at 19 of 20 roll calls at the City Council
- Committee on Budget and Government Operations: 0.6 min of speech a meeting, range 0.2–1.4. In the same range as 27 other members.
- Committee on Housing and Real Estate: 0.2 min of speech a meeting, range 0.0–0.7. In the same range as 16 other members.
- Committee on Health and Human Relations: talk time not compared. Seated for only 6 meetings in 12 months.
- Committee on Special Events, Cultural Affairs and Recreation: talk time not compared. Seated for only 3 meetings in 12 months.
- Committee on Police and Fire: talk time not compared. Seated for only 6 meetings in 12 months.
- Committee on Special Events, Cultural Affairs and Recreation: present at 2 of 2 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
Commendations, ceremonies and memorials took the largest share of Robinson’s speech with a checked topic: 26%
Robinson asked 15 questions at the six Committee on Budget and Government Operations meetings where we identified them
Of Robinson’s 11 questions to city departments at the Committee on Budget and Government Operations, 4 went to public health and mental health.
| Department | Share | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Public health and mental health | 436% | |
| Administration, HR, contracts and facilities | 327% | |
| Police | 327% | |
| Budget, finance and controller | 19% |
One place Robinson named in meetings
- Loop 1 time
Every meeting where we identified Robinson’s voice
- Sep 29, 2026City Council1.7 min1:38:36
- Sep 23, 2026City Council2.2 min1:07:57
- Sep 9, 2026Committee on Budget and Government Operations1.4 min59:22
- Jul 22, 2026City Council0.3 min1:14:06
- Jul 15, 2026City Council3.9 min3:35:45
- Jul 14, 2026Committee on Health and Human Relations3.4 min52:36
- Jul 8, 2026Committee on Housing and Real Estate1.4 min1:30:40
- Jul 7, 2026Committee on Special Events, Cultural Affairs and Recreation2.9 min1:00:48
- Jun 17, 2026City Council10.0 min1:02:02
- Jun 11, 2026Committee on Health and Human Relations4.4 min1:12:01
Show all 25Show fewer
- May 20, 2026City Council10.0 min1:59:25
- May 13, 2026Committee on Budget and Government Operations1.1 min52:21
- May 6, 2026Committee on Police and Fire2.7 min1:05:27
- Apr 15, 2026City Council2.5 min1:09:30
- Apr 9, 2026Committee on Special Events, Cultural Affairs and Recreation4.4 min1:46:40
- Mar 18, 2026City Council7.6 min1:51:44
- Mar 12, 2026Committee on Housing and Real Estate0.7 min2:12:38
- Feb 18, 2026City Council4.6 min1:22:09
- Jan 21, 2026City Council2.4 min56:15
- Dec 20, 2025City Council13.8 min2:54:12
- Dec 18, 2025City Council0.5 min1:07:39
- Dec 17, 2025Committee on Budget and Government Operations0.9 min4:00:45
- Nov 13, 2025Committee on Budget and Government Operations2.7 min2:31:40
- Nov 12, 2025Committee on Budget and Government Operations1.3 min1:25:16
- Nov 5, 2025Committee on Budget and Government Operations4.6 min6:48:14
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Robinson was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Lamont J. Robinson’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Robinson said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Robinson or of Chicago alone.
