Monique L. Scott
Alderperson, Ward 24, Chicago City CouncilRaised head tax and budget revenue at three meetings.
Also sits on 5 committees
Next City Council meeting: Mon, Nov 2, 10:00 am · Agenda
Three clips, newest first
Officials only. Public speakers are counted, never named.
Issues Scott raised, by number of meetings
- Head tax and budget revenue3 meetings
Ward 24 on the current City Council map
Every roll call, and Scott’s other bodies
Present at 18 of 20 roll calls at the City Council
- Committee on Housing and Real Estate: 0.8 min of speech a meeting, range 0.1–2.1. In the same range as 17 other members.
- Committee on Budget and Government Operations: 0.3 min of speech a meeting, range 0.1–0.9. In the same range as 26 other members.
- Committee on Finance: 0.1 min of speech a meeting, range 0.0–0.5. In the same range as 20 other members.
- Committee on License and Consumer Protection: 0.3 min of speech a meeting, range 0.0–1.0. In the same range as 10 other members.
- Committee on Special Events, Cultural Affairs and Recreation: talk time not compared. Seated for only 3 meetings in 12 months.
- Committee on Special Events, Cultural Affairs and Recreation: present at 1 of 2 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
- Committee on License and Consumer Protection: present at 9 of 10 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
Scott asked eight questions at the four Committee on Budget and Government Operations meetings where we identified them
Of Scott’s 7 questions to city departments at the Committee on Budget and Government Operations, 4 went to budget, finance and controller.
| Department | Share | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Budget, finance and controller | 457% | |
| Administration, HR, contracts and facilities | 343% |
| Department | Share | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Economic development, business and licensing | 5100% |
| Department | Share | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| City attorney / law department | 1 |
One place Scott named in meetings
- North Lawndale 1 time
Every meeting where we identified Scott’s voice
- Oct 8, 2026Committee on Housing and Real Estate2.0 min1:34:30
- Sep 16, 2026Committee on Housing and Real Estate6.6 min2:39:38
- Jul 7, 2026Committee on Special Events, Cultural Affairs and Recreation0.8 min1:03:54
- May 13, 2026Committee on Housing and Real Estate0.0 min2:28:45
- May 5, 2026Committee on License and Consumer Protection2.6 min58:03
- Apr 9, 2026Committee on Special Events, Cultural Affairs and Recreation0.7 min1:45:52
- Apr 8, 2026Committee on Housing and Real Estate1.2 min1:40:00
- Mar 18, 2026City Council1.3 min1:42:46
- Jan 14, 2026Committee on Finance0.5 min3:01:42
- Dec 20, 2025City Council4.8 min1:29:13
Show all 16Show fewer
- Dec 17, 2025Committee on Budget and Government Operations2.0 min3:55:55
- Dec 16, 2025Committee on Finance1.1 min2:05:39
- Dec 4, 2025Committee on Finance0.8 min1:36:23
- Nov 12, 2025Committee on Budget and Government Operations0.6 min1:42:32
- Nov 5, 2025Committee on Budget and Government Operations2.0 min5:20:17
- Oct 30, 2025Committee on Budget and Government Operations1.2 min5:44:54
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged
We identified Scott’s voice at 16 meetings across six bodies. A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Scott was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Monique L. Scott’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Scott said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Scott or of Chicago alone.
