Scott Waguespack
Alderperson, Ward 32, Chicago City CouncilRaised TIF districts at five meetings.
Also sits on 6 committees
See all
- City Council · Alderperson
- Committee on Finance · Member
- Committee on Transportation and Public Way · Member
- Committee on Economic, Capital and Technology Development · Member
- Committee on Ethics and Government Oversight · Member
- Committee on License and Consumer Protection · Member
- Committee on Special Events, Cultural Affairs and Recreation · Member
Next City Council meeting: Mon, Nov 2, 10:00 am · Agenda
Seven clips, newest first
Officials only. Public speakers are counted, never named.
Issues Waguespack raised, by number of meetings
- TIF districts5 meetings
- Head tax and budget revenue3 meetings
- Casino2 meetings
Ward 32 on the current City Council map
Every roll call, and Waguespack’s other bodies
Present at 19 of 20 roll calls at the City Council
- Committee on Finance: 1.8 min of speech a meeting, range 1.0–2.9. In the same range as 26 other members.
- Committee on Transportation and Public Way: 2.0 min of speech a meeting, range 0.7–3.9. In the same range as nine other members.
- Committee on License and Consumer Protection: 0.7 min of speech a meeting, range 0.0–2.4. In the same range as 10 other members.
- Committee on Economic, Capital and Technology Development: talk time not compared. On a random sample of meeting time, between 41% and 70% of members' speech here carries a name; we rank when the low end reaches 60%.
- Committee on Ethics and Government Oversight: talk time not compared. Seated for only 6 meetings in 12 months.
- Committee on Special Events, Cultural Affairs and Recreation: talk time not compared. Seated for only 3 meetings in 12 months.
- Committee on Economic, Capital and Technology Development: present at 13 of 13 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
- Committee on License and Consumer Protection: present at 9 of 10 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
- Committee on Special Events, Cultural Affairs and Recreation: present at 2 of 2 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
Waguespack asked 42 questions at the 14 Committee on Finance meetings where we identified them
Of Waguespack’s 38 questions to city departments at the Committee on Finance, 25 went to city attorney / law department.
| Department | Share | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| City attorney / law department | 2566% | |
| Budget, finance and controller | 1129% | |
| Planning and zoning | 25% |
| Department | Share | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Transportation and transit | 8100% |
| Department | Share | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Planning and zoning | 2 | |
| Technology | 1 | |
| Transportation and transit | 1 |
| Department | Share | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| City attorney / law department | 3 | |
| Mayor's office | 1 |
One place Waguespack named in meetings
- Loop 1 time
Every meeting where we identified Waguespack’s voice
- Oct 7, 2026Committee on Transportation and Public Way1.8 min1:33:33
- Oct 1, 2026Committee on Ethics and Government Oversight10.0 min44:56
- Sep 29, 2026City Council9.1 min1:23:41
- Sep 24, 2026Committee on Finance2.3 min2:33:27
- Sep 23, 2026City Council1.4 min2:56:10
- Sep 22, 2026Committee on Finance3.9 min3:03:15
- Sep 14, 2026Committee on Finance1.3 min1:18:26
- Sep 9, 2026Committee on Transportation and Public Way1.2 min34:43
- Sep 9, 2026Committee on License and Consumer Protection6.9 min1:32:59
- Jul 14, 2026Committee on Transportation and Public Way8.6 min1:07:13
Show all 39Show fewer
- Jul 13, 2026Committee on Finance0.1 min1:22:19
- Jul 9, 2026Committee on Economic, Capital and Technology Development0.7 min1:07:48
- Jul 8, 2026Committee on Transportation and Public Way2.1 min53:04
- Jun 25, 2026Committee on Finance4.6 min1:04:45
- Jun 15, 2026Committee on Finance2.3 min1:36:05
- Jun 11, 2026Committee on Economic, Capital and Technology Development0.2 min1:12:09
- Jun 10, 2026Committee on Ethics and Government Oversight5.4 min1:10:21
- May 20, 2026City Council11.5 min3:26:07
- May 19, 2026Committee on Ethics and Government Oversight8.9 min34:09
- May 18, 2026Committee on Finance2.3 min1:54:24
- May 13, 2026Committee on Transportation and Public Way7.7 min1:18:52
- May 11, 2026Committee on Economic, Capital and Technology Development2.9 min2:43:07
- Apr 15, 2026City Council0.5 min2:50:06
- Apr 13, 2026Committee on Finance2.2 min2:24:48
- Apr 9, 2026Committee on Economic, Capital and Technology Development1.7 min49:32
- Apr 9, 2026Committee on Special Events, Cultural Affairs and Recreation8.2 min58:00
- Mar 18, 2026City Council2.2 min3:36:42
- Mar 16, 2026Committee on Ethics and Government Oversight1.5 min23:56
- Mar 13, 2026Committee on Transportation and Public Way2.5 min54:55
- Mar 12, 2026Committee on License and Consumer Protection0.3 min44:19
- Feb 18, 2026City Council4.9 min1:12:48
- Feb 11, 2026Committee on Finance0.1 min2:00:02
- Feb 10, 2026Committee on Economic, Capital and Technology Development1.5 min39:29
- Feb 9, 2026Committee on Finance8.0 min2:24:46
- Jan 14, 2026Committee on Finance2.3 min53:19
- Dec 16, 2025Committee on Finance3.3 min1:21:29
- Nov 17, 2025Committee on Finance0.9 min2:09:02
- Nov 10, 2025Committee on Finance0.1 min1:24:55
- Nov 10, 2025Committee on Economic, Capital and Technology Development1.3 min17:18
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged
We identified Waguespack’s voice at 39 meetings across seven bodies. A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Waguespack was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Scott Waguespack’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Waguespack said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Waguespack or of Chicago alone.
